Acap-Bicol — Design Score: 66/100 (grade C)
Strong type & color clarity drowns in broken spacing & no interactive polish—site reads well but feels rigid and unfinished.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/acap-bicol.github.io.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 78/100
- Color & Contrast: 86/100
- Spacing & Layout: 41/100
- Motion & Polish: 42/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.25× · 1.45× (35.0/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 16.10:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 8.90:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 1 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 99% dominant (12.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (14.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — breathing room: 0.01 density · airy (4.3/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (7.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: none measured (10.0/25)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Define and enforce a spacing grid system
- Add measured CSS breakpoints for tablet & mobile
- Implement interactive hover and focus states on primary CTA
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Acap-Bicol's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with acap-bicol.github.io. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.