Arc — Design Score: 81/100 (grade B)
Strong type & color foundation with excellent CTA contrast, but spacing grid adherence is weak (42% off-grid) and motion lacks any staged entrance choreography.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/arc.net.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 85/100
- Color & Contrast: 89/100
- Spacing & Layout: 66/100
- Motion & Polish: 78/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.15× · 1.11× · 2.25× · 1.14× (29.7/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600, 700] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 0.91 (7.5/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 20.39:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 11.21:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 49% dominant (19.4/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 8px grid · 81% confidence (28.4/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 5/12 on 8px (10.4/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 150ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 0 reveal candidates (0.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Enforce spacing grid adherence across layout
- Add reveal/entrance choreography on scroll & page load
- Tighten headline line-height above 1.0
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Arc's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with arc.net. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.