Calendly — Design Score: 87/100 (grade A)
Calendly nails motion & type but spacing is patchy—grid adherence at 58% means layout feels ad-hoc, not systematic.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/calendly.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 92/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 65/100
- Motion & Polish: 98/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.18× · 1.36× · 2.50× · 1.11× (27.2/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600, 700] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.40 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.20 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 19.80:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 4.62:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 69% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 8px grid · 65% confidence (22.8/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 7/12 on 8px (14.6/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 200ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 35 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Enforce 8px grid across all spacing
- Smooth type rhythm jump at 2.50×
- Expand shadow role vocabulary
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Calendly's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with calendly.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.