Coder — Design Score: 86/100 (grade A)
Strong typographic & motion foundation (89–98) but spacing rhythm breaks down (70)—uneven grid adherence creates visual instability.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/coder.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 89/100
- Color & Contrast: 86/100
- Spacing & Layout: 70/100
- Motion & Polish: 98/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.21× · 1.08× · 2.60× · 1.11× (24.2/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600, 700] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.40 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.04 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 19.61:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 19.61:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 53% dominant (16.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 4px grid · 73% confidence (25.6/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 8/12 on 4px (16.7/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 300ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 2 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Audit & lock spacing to 4px grid
- Smooth the type ladder—tame the 2.60× jump
- Measure and document whitespace intention
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Coder's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with coder.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.