Diabrowser — Design Score: 85/100 (grade A)
Excellent typography & color hierarchy, but spacing feels cramped—whitespace gaps are hiding potential usability wins.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/diabrowser.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 96/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 58/100
- Motion & Polish: 90/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 2.00× · 1.09× · 1.22× · 1.12× (31.3/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 650] (spread 250) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.50 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.17 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 14.43:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 21.00:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 87% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 200ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 5 reveal candidates (10.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Map & enforce a spacing scale (8px or 4px base)
- Add whitespace between major sections (cards, blocks)
- Stage 5 reveal animations in order (index 15 only earns 10/20)
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Diabrowser's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with diabrowser.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.