Endel — Design Score: 81/100 (grade B)
Strong color & motion systems, but typography lacks weight hierarchy and body text feels cramped—readability and visual structure need work.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/endel.io.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 75/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 68/100
- Motion & Polish: 88/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.36× · 2.00× · 1.22× (31.1/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400] (spread 0) (4.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.27 (10.4/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.20 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 4 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 15.13:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 1 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 76% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: dark (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 8px grid · 64% confidence (22.4/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 5/7 on 8px (17.9/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 200ms dominant (25.0/25)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Add font-weight contrast to typography hierarchy
- Increase body line-height to comfortable reading zone
- Enforce 8px spacing grid across all components
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Endel's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with endel.io. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.