Figma — Design Score: 80/100 (grade B)
Figma's motion & typography nail polish; spacing grid breaks trust—only 5 of 12 elements snap to rhythm.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/figma.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 82/100
- Color & Contrast: 79/100
- Spacing & Layout: 61/100
- Motion & Polish: 98/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.57× · 1.27× · 2.75× · 1.14× (26.2/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [320, 330, 400] (spread 80) (10.3/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.44 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.00 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 21.00:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 35% dominant (9.2/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 8px grid · 67% confidence (23.5/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 5/12 on 8px (10.4/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 180ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 8 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Enforce 8px grid adherence across all spacings
- Expand accent color real estate & contrast
- Increase font-weight contrast for heading hierarchy
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Figma's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with figma.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.