Fongo — Design Score: 76/100 (grade B)
Strong typography & motion polish; spacing unmapped and weight hierarchy missing—users can't scan content depth.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/fongo.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 82/100
- Color & Contrast: 81/100
- Spacing & Layout: 58/100
- Motion & Polish: 78/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.32× · 1.12× · 1.89× · 1.12× (33.2/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400] (spread 0) (4.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.72 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.20 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 6.29:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 67% dominant (16.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 300ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 0 reveal candidates (0.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Add 2–3 font weights to create scannable hierarchy
- Measure and guarantee primary CTA button contrast
- Define and measure spacing grid & breathing room
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Fongo's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with fongo.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.