Grillitype — Design Score: 68/100 (grade C)
Strong typography + accessibility baseline, but weak button contrast kills CTA readability and spacing lacks consistency—fix the call-to-action first.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/grillitype.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 70/100
- Color & Contrast: 82/100
- Spacing & Layout: 57/100
- Motion & Polish: 53/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 2.40× · 1.25× (21.4/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400] (spread 0) (4.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.38 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.00 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 3.36:1 (6.1/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 80% dominant (16.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 4px grid · 63% confidence (22.1/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 3/7 on 4px (10.7/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 1 breakpoints (12.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 100ms dominant (20.6/25)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Raise primary button contrast to 5.5:1 minimum
- Add font-weight hierarchy: introduce 600 or 700 for headings
- Enforce 4px grid on all spacings—currently 43% miss rate
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Grillitype's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with grillitype.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.