Heptabase — Design Score: 83/100 (grade B)
Strong typography & color foundation (90s), but spacing discipline is missing—only 2 breakpoints, no grid system visible. Motion is polished but interactive states untested.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/heptabase.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 90/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 58/100
- Motion & Polish: 88/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.33× · 2.12× · 1.06× (25.2/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600, 700] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.53 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.29 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 4 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 19.60:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 13.58:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 83% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 200ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 3 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Add visible interactive states to primary CTA
- Define explicit spacing grid & enforce on tablet breakpoint
- Tighten type ladder rhythm to 1.1–1.5× jumps
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Heptabase's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with heptabase.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.