Klim — Design Score: 61/100 (grade C)
Strong color foundation (dark, high-contrast text) but typography has zero weight hierarchy and motion is static—users can't scan, nothing feels responsive.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/klim.co.nz.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 39/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 67/100
- Motion & Polish: 43/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400] (spread 0) (4.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.31 (12.7/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 1 (0.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 4.42:1 (9.7/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 94% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: dark (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 10px grid · 70% confidence (24.5/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 3/5 on 10px (15.0/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: none measured (10.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 0 reveal candidates (0.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Add font-weight contrast: introduce 600–700 weight for headings
- Establish a type scale: define 3–5 distinct sizes and enforce them
- Add entrance & scroll animations: reveal sections on scroll, stagger list items
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Klim's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with klim.co.nz. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.