Loom — Design Score: 81/100 (grade B)
Typography & color are locked in; spacing layout is skeletal (1 breakpoint) and motion lacks staged storytelling—desktop-first, not responsive.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/loom.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 96/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 54/100
- Motion & Polish: 73/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.43× · 1.33× · 1.74× · 1.06× (30.8/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 600, 700] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.63 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.03 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 14.34:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 5.20:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 62% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 1 breakpoints (12.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 100ms dominant (20.6/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 0 reveal candidates (10.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Add mobile and tablet breakpoints (currently 1 only)
- Add scroll & load-triggered reveals (staged entrances)
- Define spacing grid system (8px or 12px)
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Loom's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with loom.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.