Loops — Design Score: 79/100 (grade B)
Strong typography & motion polish; spacing is ad-hoc and body text line-height too tight—costs readability and mobile usability.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/loops.so.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 82/100
- Color & Contrast: 88/100
- Spacing & Layout: 50/100
- Motion & Polish: 90/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.04× · 1.87× · 1.76× · 1.06× (23.8/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600, 700] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.24 (8.1/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.00 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 17.49:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 97% dominant (18.4/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (7.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 160ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 6 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Establish and enforce spacing grid (4–8px base unit)
- Increase body line-height from 1.24 to 1.4–1.5
- Add CSS custom properties for motion tokens to :root
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Loops's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with loops.so. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.