Otter — Design Score: 82/100 (grade B)
Strong type & color discipline (87–90) undercut by sparse spacing strategy (58)—site feels cramped, hurts readability and conversion flow.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/otter.ai.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 87/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 58/100
- Motion & Polish: 86/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.05× · 1.17× · 2.94× · 1.14× (22.3/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [300, 400, 500, 600, 700] (spread 400) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.44 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.10 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 6.04:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 92% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 300ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 5 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Audit and enforce whitespace grid (8px or 16px base)
- Increase padding in high-intent zones (forms, CTAs, pricing tiers)
- Add secondary interactive states (hover, active) beyond focus (i17)
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Otter's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with otter.ai. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.