Ramp — Design Score: 63/100 (grade C)
Strong color & type discipline (90, 60) but sparse layout grid (46) and zero motion tokens (42) leave the experience feeling static and unresponsive.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/ramp.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 60/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 46/100
- Motion & Polish: 42/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 2.29× · 2.00× (17.8/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 21.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 16.02:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 89% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 1 breakpoints (4.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: none measured (10.0/25)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Measure and implement a responsive breakpoint system
- Flatten type ladder to 1.2–1.5× jumps; remove orphan size
- Add CSS motion tokens and define hover states for CTA
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Ramp's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with ramp.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.