Sleepcycle — Design Score: 62/100 (grade C)
Strong typography & motion polish mask critical color & spacing failures—body text is unreadable, layout feels cramped.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/sleepcycle.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 68/100
- Color & Contrast: 55/100
- Spacing & Layout: 45/100
- Motion & Polish: 78/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 3.05× · 1.05× · 4.00× · 1.05× (9.0/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [300, 400, 500, 600] (spread 300) (20.0/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.30 (12.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.45 (7.2/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 1.14:1 (0.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 14.44:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 26% dominant (4.8/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: dark (20.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — breathing room: 0.80 density · dense (0.0/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 300ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 0 reveal candidates (10.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Fix body text contrast to meet WCAG AA
- Redistribute type ladder; smooth size jumps
- Increase spacing density; add breathing room
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Sleepcycle's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with sleepcycle.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.