Statsig — Design Score: 82/100 (grade B)
Strong type & color foundations (90s), but spacing grid adherence broke at 50%—gaps between intent and execution cost you rhythm.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/statsig.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 90/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 55/100
- Motion & Polish: 86/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.62× · 1.25× · 2.29× (27.4/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600] (spread 200) (17.1/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.71 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.11 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 4 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 14.62:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 15.80:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 87% dominant (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (10.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 10px grid · 67% confidence (23.5/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 6/12 on 10px (12.5/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (7.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 400ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 3 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Audit & snap all spacings to 10px grid
- Add 2–3 more responsive breakpoints for tablets/phones
- Flatten type ladder's 2.29× jump
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Statsig's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with statsig.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.