Tldraw — Design Score: 64/100 (grade C)
Strong color hierarchy & contrast (90/100), but typography has only 2 sizes & motion lacks polish—users won't feel the interaction.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/tldraw.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 56/100
- Color & Contrast: 90/100
- Spacing & Layout: 64/100
- Motion & Polish: 38/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 2.00× (23.3/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 2 (10.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 20.10:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 16.61:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 3 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 98% dominant (14.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: light (16.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 4px grid · 68% confidence (23.8/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 5/8 on 4px (15.6/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 1 breakpoints (12.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 3000ms dominant (5.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 0 reveal candidates (10.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
Top fixes
- Replace 3000ms motion with 120–400ms interactions
- Expand type ladder from 2 sizes to 4–6 distinct steps
- Add choreographed reveal animations on scroll/load
The comprehensive report — every fix with why + the exact how-to — is part of Mozaika Pro.
An automated measurement of Tldraw's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with tldraw.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.