Tradingview — Design Score: 80/100 (grade B)
Tradingview's design scored 80/100 (grade B), measured live from the DOM by Mozaika: typography, color & contrast, spacing and motion — each anchored to a real measurement.
This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/score/tradingview.com.
The four measured dimensions
- Typography & Hierarchy: 96/100
- Color & Contrast: 83/100
- Spacing & Layout: 57/100
- Motion & Polish: 75/100
What we measured
- Typography & Hierarchy — type ladder rhythm: 1.78× · 1.29× · 1.75× · 1.14× (33.8/35)
- Typography & Hierarchy — weight contrast: [400, 500, 600] (spread 200) (17.1/20)
- Typography & Hierarchy — body line-height: 1.50 (15.0/15)
- Typography & Hierarchy — heading line-height: 1.00 (10.0/10)
- Typography & Hierarchy — size discipline: 5 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — body text contrast (WCAG): 10.00:1 (30.0/30)
- Color & Contrast — primary button contrast: 13.58:1 (10.0/10)
- Color & Contrast — accent discipline: 2 (20.0/20)
- Color & Contrast — surface coverage: 35% dominant (9.1/20)
- Color & Contrast — scheme consistency: dark (14.0/20)
- Spacing & Layout — spacing grid: 4px grid · 77% confidence (26.9/35)
- Spacing & Layout — grid adherence: 7/12 on 4px (14.6/25)
- Spacing & Layout — breathing room: 0.64 density · dense (0.0/25)
- Spacing & Layout — structure & responsive: 2 breakpoints (15.0/15)
- Motion & Polish — motion tokens: 300ms dominant (25.0/25)
- Motion & Polish — choreography: 1 reveal candidates (20.0/20)
Every line above is read from the live DOM — the exact contrast ratio, the detected spacing grid, the forced hover states — not an AI's guess from a screenshot.
An automated measurement of Tradingview's publicly-visible design (color, type, spacing, motion) — not affiliated with tradingview.com. Removal requests: hello@mozaika.design.