MozaikaHonest comparison

Refero organizes screenshots for humans. Mozaika decodes design systems for agents.

Competitor data verified July 3, 2026. Spot an error? support@mozaika.design — fixed same day.

Both plug into your AI agent over MCP. Refero's MCP hands your agent references to look at. Mozaika's MCP hands it measured specs to build with — hex tokens, type scales, spacing rhythm, decoded per section from 340 real products.

Open in Mozaika →

This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/vs/refero.

Feature by feature

Built for

Mozaika: AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) that need machine-readable specs

Refero: Designers doing visual research; agent support added on top

What an MCP query returns

Mozaika: A decoded design system: color tokens, type scale, spacing — per section

Refero: Curated screens, flows and patterns — reference images for the agent to study

Section-level decode

Mozaika: Yes — 3,600+ retina sections, each queryable with its own decoded specs

Refero: No — screens and pages as curated images

Measured design systems

Mozaika: 350+ decoded, 166 measured and verified against live CSS

Refero: Fonts info and Styles (beta); no per-section measured token specs listed

Library size

Mozaika: 3,600+ sections, 350+ design systems, 340 products — curated depth over volume

Refero: 135,000+ screens across web and iOS — significantly larger

User flows

Mozaika: No — page- and section-level today

Refero: Yes — step-by-step flows

Decode any live site

Mozaika: Yes — Decode Lens Chrome extension reads tokens off any URL

Refero: No equivalent listed

Pricing

Mozaika: Free gallery browsing; Pro subscription or one-time Founder license for lifetime access

Refero: Free (~3% of library); Pro $10/mo or $120/yr; no lifetime plan listed

When to choose Refero — honestly

If you're a designer doing visual research, Refero is excellent and we'll say so plainly: 135,000+ screens across web and iOS, real signup-to-cancellation flows, fonts info, and a polished search experience — at $10/month it's a fair deal. If your main workflow is a human browsing references before designing in Figma, choose Refero. Mozaika is the better tool when the consumer of the reference is an AI coding agent that needs numbers, not pictures: exact tokens, type scales, and spacing it can build against without inventing its own.

Questions people actually ask

Is Mozaika a Refero replacement?

Only if your use case is agent-driven building. Refero is a research library for humans with agent access added; Mozaika is built agent-first — every product is decoded into a queryable design system at the section level. Some teams use both: Refero to browse, Mozaika to build.

Both have an MCP. What's actually different?

What comes back over the wire. Refero's MCP connects your agent to curated screens and flows — visual references. Mozaika's MCP returns decoded specs: hex color tokens, measured type scales, spacing systems, per section. Your agent doesn't interpret a screenshot; it builds to a spec.

Isn't Mozaika's library much smaller?

Yes — 340 products versus 135,000+ screens, and we won't pretend otherwise. The trade is depth per product: 411 full pages sliced into 3,600+ retina sections, with 350+ decoded design systems, 166 of them measured and verified against live CSS. Curated and decoded beats big and flat when an agent is doing the reading.

Does Mozaika offer a lifetime option?

Yes — alongside a Pro subscription, there's a one-time Founder license for lifetime access. Refero's pricing page lists no lifetime option (as of July 3, 2026).

More comparisons

Mozaika vs Mobbin · Mozaika vs Godly

Connect your agent over MCP → · Browse the library free →