MozaikaHonest comparison

Refero organizes screenshots for humans. Mozaika decodes design systems for agents.

Mozaika's numbers are read live from the library on every request. Competitor data verified July 3, 2026. Spot an error? support@mozaika.design — fixed same day.

Both plug into your AI agent over MCP. Refero's MCP hands your agent references to look at. Mozaika's MCP hands it measured specs to build with — hex tokens, type scales, spacing rhythm, decoded per section from 588 real products.

Open in Mozaika →

This is a static, crawlable rendering for search & AI engines. The interactive version — filters, live decode console, copy & export — is at https://mozaika.design/vs/refero.

Feature by feature

Built for

Mozaika: AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) that need machine-readable specs

Refero: Designers doing visual research; agent support added on top

What an MCP query returns

Mozaika: A decoded design system: color tokens, type scale, spacing — per section

Refero: Curated screens, flows and patterns — reference images for the agent to study

Section-level decode

Mozaika: Yes — 3,873 retina sections, each queryable with its own decoded specs

Refero: No — screens and pages as curated images

Measured design systems

Mozaika: 548 decoded, 412 measured and verified against live CSS

Refero: Fonts info and Styles (beta); no per-section measured token specs listed

Library size

Mozaika: 3,873 sections, 548 design systems, 588 products — curated depth over volume

Refero: 135,000+ screens across web and iOS — significantly larger

User flows

Mozaika: No — page- and section-level today

Refero: Yes — step-by-step flows

Decode any live site

Mozaika: Yes — Decode Lens Chrome extension reads tokens off any URL

Refero: No equivalent listed

Pricing

Mozaika: Free gallery browsing; Pro subscription or one-time Founder license for lifetime access

Refero: Free (~3% of library); Pro $10/mo or $120/yr; no lifetime plan listed

When to choose Refero — honestly

If you're a designer doing visual research, Refero is excellent and we'll say so plainly: 135,000+ screens across web and iOS, real signup-to-cancellation flows, fonts info, and a polished search experience — at $10/month it's a fair deal. If your main workflow is a human browsing references before designing in Figma, choose Refero. Mozaika is the better tool when the consumer of the reference is an AI coding agent that needs numbers, not pictures: exact tokens, type scales, and spacing it can build against without inventing its own.

Questions people actually ask

Is Mozaika a Refero replacement?

Only if your use case is agent-driven building. Refero is a research library for humans with agent access added; Mozaika is built agent-first — every product is decoded into a queryable design system at the section level. Some teams use both: Refero to browse, Mozaika to build.

Both have an MCP. What's actually different?

What comes back over the wire. Refero's MCP connects your agent to curated screens and flows — visual references. Mozaika's MCP returns decoded specs: hex color tokens, measured type scales, spacing systems, per section. Your agent doesn't interpret a screenshot; it builds to a spec.

Isn't Mozaika's library much smaller?

Yes — 588 products versus 135,000+ screens, and we won't pretend otherwise. The trade is depth per product: 1,768 full pages sliced into 3,873 retina sections, with 548 decoded design systems, 412 of them measured and verified against live CSS. Curated and decoded beats big and flat when an agent is doing the reading.

Does Mozaika offer a lifetime option?

Yes — alongside a Pro subscription, there's a one-time Founder license for lifetime access. Refero's pricing page lists no lifetime option (as of July 3, 2026).

More comparisons

Mozaika vs Mobbin · Mozaika vs Godly

Connect your agent over MCP → · Browse the library free →